Regulatory Approval For Cancer Drugs Based On ‘Biased’ And ‘Exaggerated’ Evidence

An analysis of 32 cancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency between 2014 and 2016 has found that only 9 of them were supported by at least one randomized controlled clinical trial judged to be at low risk of bias. Around half of the trials carried out to test the drugs were considered to be at high risk of exaggerating the treatments’ supposed benefits. Published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ), the analysis also revealed that the majority of trials didn’t even evaluate overall patient survival as a primary outcome of the studies. In other words, most of the 32 cancer drugs were approved without establishing, as a key outcome, whether they increase patients’ lifespans.

Randomized controlled clinical trials are generally considered the ‘gold standard’ for medical research. In such studies, patients are randomly assigned to receive either the treatment or a placebo. The studies are normally also conducted ‘double-blind’. This means that, during the study, neither the patients nor the researchers know who is receiving the treatment and who is receiving the placebo. When followed correctly, such an approach helps prevent bias when assessing the results. As the BMJ analysis shows, however, bias in studies reporting on the outcomes of cancer drug trials is far from rare. Around half of the studies examined by the BMJ researchers were judged to be at high risk of bias based on their design, the way they were carried out, the way in which the study data were reported, or analysis of the results. Clearly, if all cancer patients were told the facts about this, few of them would consent to being treated with drugs approved in this way.

Cancer is no longer a mysterious disease

Ultimately, of course, the degree of bias and exaggeration in studies used to gain regulatory approval for cancer drugs is not at all surprising. This isn’t merely because of the lack of evidence that drugs provide the answer to eradicating cancer. It is also because they do not address the disease’s primary mechanisms in the first place.

As Dr. Rath and Dr. Niedzwiecki describe in their groundbreaking book, Victory Over Cancer, cancer is no longer a mysterious disease. Its key mechanisms of development and control are already known. While cancer can be caused by many factors, there is one common mechanism via which all types of cancer cells spread: the digestion of connective tissue around the cancer cell. Escaping the connective tissue that surrounds them is a precondition for cancer cells to grow, spread, and develop into a life-threatening disease.

Cancer cells break through the connective tissue surrounding them by producing uncontrolled amounts of naturally occurring enzymes that function as ‘biological scissors’. All cancer cells, regardless of where they originate in the body, produce these enzymes as a means of digesting the connective tissue surrounding them. The more of these enzymes a cancer cell produces, the faster it will spread. Consequently, the shorter will likely be the life expectancy of the patient.

Saving lives with natural approaches to cancer

Given that cancer cells spread by means of breaking down the connective tissue that surrounds them, it follows that stabilizing the body’s connective tissue and preventing its uncontrolled breakdown can save lives. Towards these goals, cancer research conducted at the Dr. Rath Research Institute has shown that three natural molecules play a particularly important role:

Other key micronutrients in the natural control of cancer include the amino acids arginine and N-acetyl cysteine; the minerals selenium, copper and manganese; and polyphenols such as quercetin and the green tea extract epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG).

Cancer drug trials – a conjuror’s ‘sleight of hand’ trick

It is not only in Europe that regulatory approval of cancer drugs is based on biased and exaggerated evidence. In their analysis of the 32 cancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency, the BMJ researchers also describe how a large American evaluation found that clinical studies of cancer drugs in the United States were less likely to be randomized and double-blinded than studies of drugs in other disease areas. This situation is no accident, of course. It simply reflects the fact that cancer is the pharmaceutical industry’s most profitable disease. To the pharmaceutical ‘business with disease’, science comes a very poor second to shareholder profits.

As such, while the BMJ researchers write that their findings “highlight the need to improve the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of cancer drug trials”, their recommendation avoids the facts. Any thorough medical journal assessment of the efficacy of pharmaceutical treatments for cancer would inevitably conclude that chemical drugs are not and never will be the answer to this disease. Far from being based on science, cancer drug trials bear more resemblance to a conjuror’s ‘sleight of hand’ trick. Public acceptance of chemotherapy and other drugs for cancer depends upon keeping patients ignorant of the losing hand they are dealt when consenting to treatment. With an estimated 9.6 million deaths occurring globally from cancer in 2018 alone, it is time for the world to be told the truth.

• Bio
• Latest Posts

Paul Anthony Taylor

Executive Director of the Dr. Rath Health Foundation and one of the coauthors of our explosive book, “The Nazi Roots of the ‘Brussels EU'”, Paul is also our expert on the Codex Alimentarius Commission and has had eye-witness experience, as an official observer delegate, at its meetings.

Prior to joining the Foundation, Paul's background was in the music industry, where he worked as a keyboard player and programmer with artists including Paul McCartney, Bryan Ferry, Bill Withers, the Verve, Texas, and Primal Scream.

He first became interested in natural health after falling ill with a chronic fatigue syndrome-related disorder in 1991 and subsequently making a full recovery through the use of natural health therapies. After meeting Dr. Rath and Dr. Niedzwiecki at an anti-Codex rally in Berlin in 2002, Paul was inspired to make a life-changing decision to leave the music industry to work for the Foundation and help defend the right of patients worldwide to have free access to natural health approaches.

You can find Paul on Twitter at @paulanthtaylor

Der Executive Director der Dr. Rath Health Foundation ist einer der Koautoren des explosiven Buchs „Die Nazi-Wurzeln der Brüsseler EU“. Paul ist auch unser Experte zum Thema „Codex Alimentarius-Kommission“ und hat Augenzeugenerfahrung als offizieller beobachtender Teilnehmer bei diesen Treffen.

Bevor er seine Arbeit bei der Stiftung antrat war Paul in der Musikindustrie aktiv. Er arbeitete als Keyboard-Spieler und Programmierer mit Künstlern wie Paul McCartney, Bryan Ferry, Bill Withers, the Verve, Texas und Primal Scream.

Sein Interesse an natürlicher Gesundheit wuchs, als er 1991 an Störungen erkrankte, die aus einem chronischen Erschöpfungssyndrom resultierten. Durch natürliche Gesundheitstherapien wurde er schließlich vollständig geheilt. Ein Treffen 2002 mit Dr. Rath und Dr. Niedzwiecki bei einer Anti-Codex-Demonstration in Berlin inspirierte ihn zu einer lebensverändernden Entscheidung und er verließ die Musikindustrie um für die Stiftung zu arbeiten und das Recht der Patienten zu verteidigen, weltweit freien Zugang zu natürlichen Gesundheitsverfahren zu haben.

Auf Twitter ist Paul unter @paulanthtaylor zu finden.

Latest posts by Paul Anthony Taylor (see all)

• Police Arrest 22 Suspects During Probe Into Major Fraud Linked to European Union COVID-19 Recovery Fund - April 19, 2024
• Plummeting Deaths From Heart Disease in United States Reflect Rise in Use of Dietary Supplements - April 12, 2024
• Growing Evidence of the Protective Effect of Vitamin D Against Breast Cancer - April 5, 2024
• Doctors Report Mysterious Worldwide Cancer ‘Epidemic’ - March 29, 2024
• ‘Definitive’ Evidence Linking Vitamin D to Lower Risk of COVID-19 and ICU Admission - March 22, 2024