UK Journalists Say Alternative Covid-19 News Has Been ‘Censored’ To Create ‘One Official Narrative’

As this news story illustrates, many journalists now privately admit that the public has been receiving a distorted and incomplete analysis of the facts about the coronavirus pandemic. Right from the outset, for example, stories reporting that Nobel prize-winning scientist Professor Luc Montagnier believes the virus was created in a laboratory were essentially banned and discredited.

Additionally, as early as March 2020, a Chinese medical team reported it was successfully treating coronavirus patients with high-dose vitamin C. As important as this development was, it was still effectively ignored by the vast majority of mainstream media news outlets.

Crucial scientific findings made by researchers at the Dr. Rath Research Institute have similarly not been covered. In groundbreaking studies published in July and August 2020, the institute’s researchers proved that specific combinations of micronutrients could block the entry of the coronavirus into human cells and optimize immunity against it. Despite these studies providing a viable science-based alternative to gene-based vaccines, the mainstream media has prevented the public from learning about them.

Tellingly, therefore, US government-funded research concluding that the risks of coronavirus vaccines are not being adequately disclosed has also been ignored; as too has the fact that plans for vaccine passports in Europe were in place 20 months prior to the pandemic.

With many of the numerous worldwide protests against coronavirus restrictions similarly having gone unreported, it is clear that the public is being fed an unbalanced and distorted version of the truth. So long as such censorship exists, public trust in the mainstream media will inevitably continue to fall.