The plaintiffs in this case argue that Gates and his affiliates deliberately misrepresented COVID-19 vaccine safety. Despite objections from Gates’ attorneys, the District Court of Leeuwarden asserted jurisdiction on October 16, allowing the case to proceed with a hearing scheduled for November 27.
The plaintiffs initially filed their case in 2022 against Gates, former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, and other officials involved in the Netherlands’ pandemic response. The court determined that the claims presented were interrelated enough to justify its jurisdiction, even over international figures. The judge’s decision, which requires Gates to cover certain legal fees, suggests that figures who are influential in global health may still be held accountable in local jurisdictions where alleged harm occurred.
Attorney Arno van Kessel, representing the plaintiffs, sees the decision as a significant precedent. An emotional statement from one plaintiff’s father, describing his daughter’s severe health decline after vaccination, underscored the plaintiffs’ desire to hold powerful figures accountable for the pandemic response, which they associate with the World Economic Forum’s so-called ‘Great Reset’ agenda.
To read how the world’s largest COVID-19 vaccine study has confirmed their links to serious health problems, see this article on our website.
New Roundup Weedkiller is 45 Times More Toxic to Human Health
November 1, 2024Germany Identifies its First Case of New Mpox Variant
November 1, 2024Judge Rules Bill Gates Must Face Vaccine-Injured in Netherlands Court
News
A Netherlands judge has ruled that Bill Gates must face seven people injured by COVID-19 vaccines in court in the Netherlands. Other defendants include Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, and the Dutch state.
[Source: childrenshealthdefense.org]
[Image source: Wikimedia]
Comment
The plaintiffs in this case argue that Gates and his affiliates deliberately misrepresented COVID-19 vaccine safety. Despite objections from Gates’ attorneys, the District Court of Leeuwarden asserted jurisdiction on October 16, allowing the case to proceed with a hearing scheduled for November 27.
The plaintiffs initially filed their case in 2022 against Gates, former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, and other officials involved in the Netherlands’ pandemic response. The court determined that the claims presented were interrelated enough to justify its jurisdiction, even over international figures. The judge’s decision, which requires Gates to cover certain legal fees, suggests that figures who are influential in global health may still be held accountable in local jurisdictions where alleged harm occurred.
Attorney Arno van Kessel, representing the plaintiffs, sees the decision as a significant precedent. An emotional statement from one plaintiff’s father, describing his daughter’s severe health decline after vaccination, underscored the plaintiffs’ desire to hold powerful figures accountable for the pandemic response, which they associate with the World Economic Forum’s so-called ‘Great Reset’ agenda.
To read how the world’s largest COVID-19 vaccine study has confirmed their links to serious health problems, see this article on our website.
Dr. Rath Health Foundation
Related posts
Idaho Health Agency Halts COVID-19 Vaccine Program
Read more