Intended to form part of international law, preparations for the creation of a World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic treaty began in 2021. Far from strengthening the prevention of, preparedness for, and response to future pandemics as the text claims, its implementation could severely undermine democracy by limiting the ability of national parliaments to make crucial healthcare decisions in the best interests of their citizens. Aided by proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations of 2005, the treaty threatens to transform the WHO into a global health dictatorship.
But the growing concern over the WHO pandemic treaty isn’t only due to the fact that it could undermine democracy. Through introducing the term “infodemic,” the treaty seems to be attempting to prevent the spread of truthful information about science-based natural health approaches and dangerous experimental vaccines.
Without citing any evidence, the treaty text claims that having “too much information” available during a disease outbreak causes “confusion and risk-taking behaviors that can harm health.” Suggesting who this wording is primarily intended to benefit – essentially, the WHO itself – the treaty states that having too much information apparently “leads to mistrust in health authorities.” To counter this, “infodemic management, at local, national, regional and international levels,” is proposed.
To learn more about the WHO’s pandemic treaty, and why it should be opposed, see this article on our website.
Many Cancer Drugs Still Unproven 5 Years After Being Given Accelerated Approval in United States
April 18, 2024People Who Take Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) Warned Even ‘Really Low’ Doses Can Damage Heart
April 18, 2024Massive Rallies Break Out in Japan Against World Health Organization’s Pandemic Treaty
News
April 13, 2024, will be etched in the annals of modern Japanese history as tens of thousands of citizens across the nation came together in a series of rallies. The protests centered on the widespread opposition to the World Health Organization’s pandemic treaty.
[Source: aussie17.com]
[Image source: Adobe Stock]
Comment
Intended to form part of international law, preparations for the creation of a World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic treaty began in 2021. Far from strengthening the prevention of, preparedness for, and response to future pandemics as the text claims, its implementation could severely undermine democracy by limiting the ability of national parliaments to make crucial healthcare decisions in the best interests of their citizens. Aided by proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations of 2005, the treaty threatens to transform the WHO into a global health dictatorship.
But the growing concern over the WHO pandemic treaty isn’t only due to the fact that it could undermine democracy. Through introducing the term “infodemic,” the treaty seems to be attempting to prevent the spread of truthful information about science-based natural health approaches and dangerous experimental vaccines.
Without citing any evidence, the treaty text claims that having “too much information” available during a disease outbreak causes “confusion and risk-taking behaviors that can harm health.” Suggesting who this wording is primarily intended to benefit – essentially, the WHO itself – the treaty states that having too much information apparently “leads to mistrust in health authorities.” To counter this, “infodemic management, at local, national, regional and international levels,” is proposed.
To learn more about the WHO’s pandemic treaty, and why it should be opposed, see this article on our website.
Dr. Rath Health Foundation
Related posts
Low Vitamin B12 May Lead to Higher Risk of Testosterone Deficiency and Infertility Among Men
Read more